For example, a person with the obsessive-compulsive disorder may care a lot about things like not stepping on a crack in the sidewalk even though this is objectively unimportant. A similar issue may concern the importance some people invest in a computer game or their favorite sports team. Another difference is that some form of higher purpose is necessary for meaningfulness but not for importance. It has also been argued that meaningfulness can be brought about by the mere appreciation of valuable things. For importance, however, valuable things must be created or defended and not just admired.
Webster DictionaryRate this definition:1.0 / 1 vote
- It refers to the degree to which something is valuable, meaningful, or essential, often because of its impact, role, or significance in a particular context.
- For importance, however, valuable things must be created or defended and not just admired.
- There are innumerous entities in the world together with a vast number of ways of interacting with them at any moment.
- Some of them may be beneficial by helping the person achieve something else they desire, like fame or power.
- The idea behind this view is that, by starting to care about something, this thing becomes important to the person even if it was unimportant to them before.
Another aspect of importance, besides its dependence on a context, is that it is relational. This means that it involves an explicit or implicit comparison with other entities in the corresponding domain. This is similar to other gradable adjectives, like «small» or «expensive», which carry an implicit comparison to other entities in the corresponding domain. For example, a baby whale is small in relation to other whales even though it is not small when compared to other forms of sea life. This comparison can be directly linked to the degree of impact that the entity makes. An entity is important within a domain if it makes a bigger impact than most of the other entities belonging to the domain.
Being important because one discovers a cure for cancer is a valuable form of importance while being important because one causes a global pandemic is a bad form of importance. This is a key difference since some people may be driven by a desire for importance independent of whether it is positive or negative. In this case, they may cause a lot of havoc to the world around them if they are under the impression that they can only achieve importance through a negative impact. For example, someone may «try to become important by assassinating a political leader or cultural figure» without caring about the negative side effects of this act.
Some researchers also consider the possibility of a form of absolute importance that is not restricted to one specific domain. Things that are important to everything else or the world as a whole may fall into this category. However, various theorists have expressed doubts that anything is significant enough to fall into this category. On the other side of the spectrum, almost anything has importance if a very specific and trivial context is chosen correspondingly.
Caring
According to Harry Frankfurt, there is a difference between what is important to us and what is morally right. For example, an agent may decide against the course of action demanded by morality since they ascribe more importance to factors outside the moral domain. So people care about many other things besides ethics, such as luxury, friendship, knowledge, and well-being. For example, a job applicant may lie about their qualifications because getting the job is more important to them than their moral obligation to refrain from lying. This applies to individuals who have made it their highest purpose to lead the best life from an ethical point of view.
Are you a words master?
- For example, knowing a certain historic fact may be instrumentally important for someone trying to pass an exam but may lack importance independent of this goal.
- A similar view is defended by Matthew Smith, who argues from a third-person perspective that a thing becomes important or morally significant if someone cares about it.
- For example, a spy may find it very difficult to continue in their discreet line of business if they become well known due to their importance.
- Being important, on the other hand, carries with it various instrumental values but need not improve the quality of the life in question.
- But it has proven difficult to give a clear and non-circular definition of it.
Considerations of the relative importance of these entities and possible actions help the individual simplify this complexity. This happens by focusing only on the most important factors and deliberating the relative worth of each possible goal when deciding what to do. In the case of rational choice theory, for example, this is realized by making a cost-benefit analysis to determine the significance of each option.
Find a translation for the Importance definition in other languages:
The word ‘Importance’ (Noun) refers to the quality of being significant, valuable, or worthy of attention. In this guide, you’ll learn the full definition, synonyms, antonyms, etymology, and real-life examples of how to use ‘Importance’ correctly in sentences. Closely related to this issue is the role of importance in psychology, specifically in moral psychology. There are innumerous entities in the world together with a vast number of ways of interacting with them at any moment.
Causal impact view
Usually, a certain primacy is given to objective importance, which is seen as an independent factor. In this view, the subjective attitude of caring should track this objective factor. According to Harry Frankfurt, for example, caring about something makes this thing important to the person.
According to Guy Kahane, the distinction between instrumental value and final value found in axiology has its counterpart in the field of importance. So some things are important relative to a specific goal while others are important by contributing to the intrinsic https://traderoom.info/importance-of-sdlc-software-development-life-cycle/ or final value. For example, knowing a certain historic fact may be instrumentally important for someone trying to pass an exam but may lack importance independent of this goal. Importance is a very basic concept and most people have an intuitive familiarity and understanding of it.
But it has proven difficult to give a clear and non-circular definition of it. For this reason, many theorists have tried to elucidate the concept by comparing it with various related concepts, such as «meaningfulness», «value», «significance», or «caring». However, such an approach is not unproblematic since these terms are sometimes also used as synonyms. It refers to the degree to which something is valuable, meaningful, or essential, often because of its impact, role, or significance in a particular context.
The idea behind this view is that, by starting to care about something, this thing becomes important to the person even if it was unimportant to them before. This can be understood in the sense that the caring attitude causes a need and thereby ties the thing to the person’s well-being. A similar view is defended by Matthew Smith, who argues from a third-person perspective that a thing becomes important or morally significant if someone cares about it. This caring attitude by one person then acts as a reason for other people to change their behavior towards this thing accordingly. For this reason, many theorists try to distinguish different types of importance to clarify what they mean and to avoid misunderstandings.
Other counterexamples aim to show that, at least in a few cases, a large causal impact is not necessary for importance. For example, it has been argued that if there was sentient life in Alpha Centauri, its intrinsic value would significantly affect the overall importance of Alpha Centauri. This would be the case even if the causal influence of this life on other star systems was negligible. Or on a small scale, a short period of extraordinary suffering before death may significantly affect the overall value of someone’s life even if it does not have any wider causal impact. It refers to how valuable or meaningful something is, often in terms of impact or priority in a situation or decision.
An example of this might be a utilitarian who is fully committed to maximizing the well-being of everyone in their sphere of influence and gives precedence to this goal over all other goals. This issue raises the question of the value of importance, i.e. whether it is good for a person to be important or whether this should be desired. This also has a moral dimension since it determines whether the motivation to become important is morally acceptable or misguided.
Deja una respuesta